The impact of the Australian Black Summer Bushfires and the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing in persons with multiple sclerosis; preparation for future and ongoing crises.

PURPOSE: The Australian multiple sclerosis (MS) community experienced two recent major crises, widespread bushfires and the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to understand the needs of persons with MS during times of crisis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consumer-directed mixed-method study. We included an online survey, semi-structured interviews, and a workshop with persons with MS, carers, healthcare professionals, and disability advocates. Data were collected via: (1) 176 people completing online surveys to identify crisis concerns and communications, (2) 29 people completing online interviews on bushfire and pandemic impact, and (3) 13 people participating in a crises-priorities workshop. Descriptive data were calculated for survey response, and a general inductive analytical approach was taken with interview and workshop responses. RESULTS: The most significant concerns were bushfire smoke exposure and disease-modifying-medication and susceptibility to COVID-19 (66% and 63% mean concern score, respectively). Interviews indicated crises experiences from the bushfires, and the pandemic overlapped respective of changes in mood and symptom stability. For bushfires, a need for future preparations, and for the pandemic, the benefits of social restrictions, disclosing personal health information and increased care burden were important. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple crises challenged the MS community but offered lessons for healthcare in future crises. Continued progress in centralised crisis information, with considered use of telehealth and rural healthcare support, is needed.Implications for rehabilitationThe MS community showed high concerns for the effect of toxic smoke from the 2019/2020 Australian bushfires and, separately, for the disease-modifying-medication and susceptibility to COVID-19.The MS community placed priority on a crisis management plan for individuals.Reduced social activity due to restrictions was beneficial for MS symptom self-awareness and may help overall fatigue management.Healthcare system preparation must prepare to alleviate increased carer workload at times of crisis.

Healthcare complexities during community crises: Recommendation for access to healthcare for Australians with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: In 2019 and 2020, over 17 million hectares of Australia burned, and half of the Australian population was affected by toxic bushfire smoke. Then in 2020, restrictions designed to curtail the spread of COVID-19 resulted in significant changes to healthcare access. There is no Australian emergency management standard for persons with disabilities, including those with multiple sclerosis (MS). Persons with MS often require multidisciplinary and complex care, with continuity of treatment essential to prevent disease progression. OBJECTIVE: To identify limitations in access to healthcare from the perspective of persons with MS as well as MS care providers during recent crises and make recommendations for policy to improve MS healthcare access during a crisis. METHOD: In mid-2020, we undertook online surveys and interviews with persons with MS, their carers, healthcare professionals and staff of MS service providers (i.e., care providers). We used descriptive analysis for quantitative, and a general inductive approach for qualitative data. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirteen persons with MS and a total of 63 MS care providers, who were close carers, healthcare professionals and service providers provided survey responses. For participants with MS, limited access to general practitioners and medical tests were of the most significant concern during the bushfires and the pandemic. In contrast, during the pandemic accessing physiotherapy was another top concern. Twenty-nine people participated in in-depth interviews, revealing that reduced healthcare access during the bushfire and the pandemic caused concern. The use of telehealth received both positive and negative reviews. All participants indicated a need for preparation and planning for healthcare access before a crisis. Persons with MS recommended centralised information sources, prioritised access to healthcare and increased levels of MS nurses and other allied healthcare. Care providers recommended centralised information sources, more nursing and mental health care access, and increased opportunities for multidisciplinary telehealth delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the involvement of the MS community in creating and designing disaster preparation plans, which should cater to a range of disaster types, to improve disaster preparedness in a community that is vulnerable to increasingly common community crises.

Social determinants of health in multiple sclerosis.

Social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. These circumstances are the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes. Evidence indicates that health behaviours, comorbidities and disease-modifying therapies all contribute to multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes; however, our knowledge of the effects of social determinants - that is, the 'risks of risks' - on health has not yet changed our approach to MS. Assessing and addressing social determinants of health could fundamentally improve health and health care in MS; this approach has already been successful in improving outcomes in other chronic diseases. In this narrative Review, we identify and discuss the body of evidence supporting an effect of many social determinants of health, including racial background, employment and social support, on MS outcomes. It must be noted that many of the published studies were subject to bias, and screening tools and/or practical interventions that address these social determinants are, for the most part, lacking. The existing work does not fully explore the potential bidirectional and complex relationships between social determinants of health and MS, and the interpretation of findings is complicated by the interactions and intersections among many of the identified determinants. On the basis of the reviewed literature, we consider that, if effective interventions targeting social determinants of health were available, they could have substantial effects on MS outcomes. Therefore, funding for and focused design of studies to evaluate and address social determinants of health are urgently needed.